From 428053f0c2e4e143a7b033ca793902fe2e62e98e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:53:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] check regexp for syntax

---
 code/elbb.el | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/code/elbb.el b/code/elbb.el
index de90abd..d6e48e6 100644
--- a/code/elbb.el
+++ b/code/elbb.el
@@ -1,3 +1,38 @@
+* prefer cond over case?
+
+;; From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
+;; Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:03:39 +0200
+;; To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
+;; Subject: Re: Perferr cond over case?
+
+;; pjb@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes:
+
+;; > Nordlöw <per.nordlow@gmail.com> writes:
+;; >
+;; >> Does the use of the cl macro case() incurr some loss of performance
+;; >> compare to using cond() instead?
+;; >
+;; > (macroexpand '(case (* 2 2 2 2 3)
+;; >                 (10      'one)
+;; >                 ((24 42) 'two)
+;; >                 ((3 33)  'three)
+;; >                 (otherwise 'unknown)))
+;; > -->
+;; > (let ((--cl-var-- (* 2 2 2 2 3)))
+;; >     (cond ((eql --cl-var-- (quote 10)) (quote one))
+;; >           ((member* --cl-var-- (quote (24 42))) (quote two))
+;; >           ((member* --cl-var-- (quote (3 33))) (quote three))
+;; >           (t (quote unknown))))
+;; >
+;; > What do you think?
+
+;; Before or after byte compilation?
+
+;; -- 
+;; David Kastrup
+
+
+
 ;; * batch-mode
 
 ;; From: Decebal <cldwesterhof@gmail.com>
-- 
2.11.4.GIT