From d39ece17e0590aa7fd484cf273a7402f704a7ebb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?G=C3=BCnther=20Deschner?= Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:07:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] s4-smbtorture: add spoolss EnumPrinterData vs EnumPrinterDataEx consistency test. Guenther --- source4/torture/rpc/spoolss.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/spoolss.c b/source4/torture/rpc/spoolss.c index 909872ce7f8..65b964ad169 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/spoolss.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/spoolss.c @@ -3144,6 +3144,87 @@ static bool test_EnumPrinterDataEx(struct torture_context *tctx, return true; } +static bool test_EnumPrinterData_consistency(struct torture_context *tctx, + struct dcerpc_pipe *p, + struct policy_handle *handle) +{ + uint32_t count; + struct spoolss_PrinterEnumValues *info; + int i; + uint32_t value_needed, data_needed; + uint32_t value_offered, data_offered; + WERROR result; + + torture_comment(tctx, "Testing EnumPrinterData vs EnumPrinterDataEx consistency"); + + torture_assert(tctx, + test_EnumPrinterDataEx(tctx, p, handle, "PrinterDriverData", &count, &info), + "failed to call EnumPrinterDataEx"); + + /* get the max sizes for value and data */ + + torture_assert(tctx, + test_EnumPrinterData(tctx, p, handle, 0, 0, 0, + NULL, &value_needed, &data_needed, + NULL, NULL, &result), + "EnumPrinterData failed"); + torture_assert_werr_ok(tctx, result, "unexpected result"); + + /* check if the reply from the EnumPrinterData really matches max values */ + + for (i=0; i < count; i++) { + if (info[i].value_name_len > value_needed) { + torture_fail(tctx, + talloc_asprintf(tctx, + "EnumPrinterDataEx gave a reply with value length %d which is larger then expected max value length %d from EnumPrinterData", + info[i].value_name_len, value_needed)); + } + if (info[i].data_length > data_needed) { + torture_fail(tctx, + talloc_asprintf(tctx, + "EnumPrinterDataEx gave a reply with data length %d which is larger then expected max data length %d from EnumPrinterData", + info[i].data_length, data_needed)); + } + } + + /* assuming that both EnumPrinterData and EnumPrinterDataEx do either + * sort or not sort the replies by value name, we should be able to do + * the following entry comparison */ + + data_offered = data_needed; + value_offered = value_needed; + + for (i=0; i < count; i++) { + + enum winreg_Type type; + const char *value_name; + uint8_t *data; + WERROR result; + uint32_t value_needed, data_needed; + + torture_assert(tctx, + test_EnumPrinterData(tctx, p, handle, i, value_offered, data_offered, + &type, &value_needed, &data_needed, + &value_name, &data, &result), + "EnumPrinterData failed"); + + if (i -1 == count) { + torture_assert_werr_equal(tctx, result, WERR_NO_MORE_ITEMS, + "unexpected result"); + break; + } else { + torture_assert_werr_ok(tctx, result, "unexpected result"); + } + + torture_assert_int_equal(tctx, type, info[i].type, "type mismatch"); + torture_assert_int_equal(tctx, value_needed, info[i].value_name_len, "value name length mismatch"); + torture_assert_str_equal(tctx, value_name, info[i].value_name, "value name mismatch"); + torture_assert_int_equal(tctx, data_needed, info[i].data_length, "data length mismatch"); + torture_assert_mem_equal(tctx, data, info[i].data->data, info[i].data_length, "data mismatch"); + } + + return true; +} static bool test_DeletePrinterData(struct torture_context *tctx, struct dcerpc_pipe *p, @@ -4087,6 +4168,10 @@ static bool test_OpenPrinterEx(struct torture_context *tctx, ret = false; } + if (!test_EnumPrinterData_consistency(tctx, p, handle)) { + ret = false; + } + if (!test_printer_keys(tctx, p, &handle)) { ret = false; } @@ -4886,6 +4971,10 @@ static bool test_one_printer(struct torture_context *tctx, ret = false; } + if (!test_EnumPrinterData_consistency(tctx, p, handle)) { + ret = false; + } + if (!test_SetPrinterDataEx_matrix(tctx, p, handle, name, NULL, NULL)) { ret = false; } -- 2.11.4.GIT