| commit | 040a3e1e04cd36ac9f061096f3906cd1cd997c60 | |
| author | Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org> | |
| Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:20:20 +0000 (6 14:20 -0700) | ||
| committer | Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org> | |
| Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:14:08 +0000 (15 22:14 +0100) | ||
| tree | 4de8e70d55b5e51e7b28961d06c17942e841ef7d | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | e5ff3e1b10eb5833f23f852454073625a1bd847a | commitdiff |
talloc: Add a separate pool size
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit a3d9099d9a96b36df21ee0733adc5210438fe9dc)
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit a3d9099d9a96b36df21ee0733adc5210438fe9dc)
| lib/talloc/talloc.c | diffblobblamehistory |